Awareness
- Cybersecurity awareness sessions
- Role-based awareness content
- Human risk awareness

Build practical cybersecurity awareness and strengthen incident readiness through training and exercises.
Last reviewed:
Cybersecurity training and awareness helps people recognise relevant risks and practise the behaviours their roles require. General awareness, technical training and leadership exercises have different learning objectives. JODOR scopes the audience, decisions and practical scenarios first, so sessions relate to the organisation's services and policies. Attendance alone is not evidence that behaviour changed or that an organisation meets every security obligation.
This service supports new-starter awareness, role-based learning for privileged users and exercises for incident decision-makers. Programmes should accommodate language, accessibility and operational schedules. A short targeted exercise can be more useful than an undifferentiated course, particularly when teams need to practise escalation, evidence handling or decisions that affect customers and service availability.
TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCES
What we cover
Delivery starts with an agreed scope, named asset owners, access permissions, evidence requirements and a communication plan. For this service, the discussion includes Cybersecurity awareness sessions, Role-based awareness content, Human risk awareness, Tabletop exercises. Observations are connected to their source and business context, and assumptions are checked with the relevant owners. Work outside the agreement is raised explicitly rather than silently added. Review points and escalation arrangements help your team understand what has been completed, what remains uncertain and which actions depend on information or authorisation from you.
01
02
03
04
Deliverables connect the findings to the agreed business objective rather than simply export tool output. Recommendations identify rationale, relative priority, proposed ownership and dependencies on other teams or technologies. We distinguish verified observations from items requiring further evidence, and explain limitations that affect confidence. Sensitive material is handled under the agreed arrangements. A readout gives your team an opportunity to challenge conclusions and clarify next steps. Implementation, retesting and continued oversight are included only where the proposal explicitly defines them.
Timing is agreed after scoping and checking evidence readiness, system access and stakeholder availability. A bounded assessment may take several weeks; implementation or ongoing support needs a separate phased plan. The proposal identifies assumptions, dependencies and review points. Changes to assets, permissions or access can change the schedule. An indicative duration is not a universal delivery promise or a substitute for confirming your actual environment.
Agree measures that connect to the learning objective, such as scenario decisions, reporting quality or completion of a practical task. Attendance and quiz scores can help but do not capture every aspect of behaviour. Measurements should be proportionate and respect privacy. We distinguish training results from broader security outcomes, which also depend on usable processes, management support and technical controls.
Prepare asset and service ownership details, relevant policies, available records and an approved way to share evidence. We discuss Cybersecurity awareness sessions, Role-based awareness content, Human risk awareness, Tabletop exercises. Access must be authorised before any intrusive or privileged activity begins. Missing information is recorded as a limitation and prioritised with your team, rather than automatically interpreted as proof that a control either exists or has failed.
Findings should connect the observation, relevant risk and required control to a proposed owner and verifiable outcome. Management resolves competing priorities and decides whether to treat or accept risk within its authority. Closing a ticket alone does not prove that an issue has been removed. We explain suitable verification, with retesting or continued tracking included only when explicitly agreed in scope.
Timing is agreed after scoping and checking evidence readiness, system access and stakeholder availability. A bounded assessment may take several weeks; implementation or ongoing support needs a separate phased plan. The proposal identifies assumptions, dependencies and review points. Changes to assets, permissions or access can change the schedule. An indicative duration is not a universal delivery promise or a substitute for confirming your actual environment.
No. The service supports assessment, improvement and evidence within an agreed scope; it cannot prevent every incident or confer regulatory approval. Applicable obligations depend on your activities, supervising authority and the requirements in force. Management retains responsibility for implementation, risk decisions and any formal submission. We describe what was and was not assessed so that a scoped finding is not mistaken for an organisation-wide guarantee.
Explore SAMA regulatory compliance guidance for this service
Fill out the form and we'll get back to you soon
We reply within one business day.